Innovative Research Award
Nimisha Srivastava
Amity University · India
Nimisha Srivastava recognizes research contributions that demonstrate originality, scholarly rigor, and potential value to scientific and professional communities. This academic recognition profile presents the supplied research information for Nimisha Srivastava of Amity University, India, whose stated subject area is pharmaceutical sciences. The profile also identifies the researcher in connection with the International Research Awards on Network Science & Graph Analytics. Research metrics are reported as supplied and should be checked against the researcher’s current public profiles before formal publication. [1] [2]
1. Abstract
This article provides an academic recognition profile for Nimisha Srivastava, affiliated with Amity University in India, with pharmaceutical sciences identified as the subject area. The supplied research indicators comprise 71 documents, 570 citations, and an h-index of 12. These indicators offer a quantitative snapshot of reported scholarly output and citation activity, but they do not independently establish the quality, originality, or practical significance of individual contributions. A detailed assessment of research topics, publication records, and documented outcomes would be needed to describe specific scientific achievements reliably. [1] [2]
2. Keywords
Innovative Research Award; Nimisha Srivastava; Amity University; India; pharmaceutical sciences; academic research; research impact; scholarly publications; citation metrics; research recognition; International Research Awards on Network Science & Graph Analytics.
3. Introduction
Academic awards provide a framework for recognizing research achievements, encouraging knowledge exchange, and highlighting work that may contribute to scientific advancement. In pharmaceutical sciences, research can encompass drug discovery, formulation development, pharmacology, pharmaceutical analysis, drug delivery, and related areas. The significance of any particular contribution depends on the research question, methodological quality, reproducibility, and relevance to the scientific or healthcare community.
The Innovative Research Award profile presented here summarizes the information supplied for Nimisha Srivastava. The event named in the profile is the International Research Awards on Network Science & Graph Analytics. The researcher’s stated subject area is pharmaceutical sciences; no specific connection between that discipline and network science or graph analytics is asserted without supporting evidence. The event’s official website provides the relevant organizational context. [3]
4. Research Profile
The information supplied identifies Nimisha Srivastava as a researcher affiliated with Amity University in India. Pharmaceutical sciences is listed as the subject area. A public researcher profile can help readers examine publication metadata, author attribution, citation activity, and scholarly outputs, provided that the profile is correctly matched to the individual. [1] [2]
The following information was provided for this article:
These details are presented as supplied rather than as independently verified measurements. Researcher metrics can change over time and may differ across databases because of coverage, citation matching, duplicate records, and profile maintenance. A current profile review is recommended before the figures are used in a formal award announcement. [1] [2]
5. Research Contributions
A comprehensive account of a researcher’s contributions normally considers published studies, the questions addressed, methods used, principal findings, and the influence of the work on subsequent research or professional practice. In pharmaceutical sciences, relevant contributions may include experimental studies, analytical methods, formulation strategies, drug-delivery technologies, pharmacological investigations, or reviews that synthesize existing evidence. These are general examples of the discipline and are not claims about the specific work of Nimisha Srivastava.
The supplied information does not include individual publication titles, abstracts, experimental findings, patents, clinical outcomes, or project descriptions. Accordingly, this profile does not attribute particular discoveries or inventions to the researcher. A publication-level review would provide the evidence needed to identify research themes and explain the originality, methodological strengths, and potential applications of specific contributions.
6. Publications
The supplied profile information reports 71 documents. This figure is presented as a reported total and should not be interpreted as a verified count of peer-reviewed journal articles alone. Bibliographic databases may include different document types, such as research articles, reviews, conference papers, and other indexed publications. The composition of the reported document total has not been provided. [1] [2]
For a complete publication record, individual entries should be checked against the researcher’s public scholarly profile and the publishers’ records. Where available, each entry should include the article title, author list, publication year, journal or conference, volume and page information, and DOI. No individual publications or DOI identifiers were supplied for this article, so no paper-specific citations are asserted.
7. Research Impact
The supplied bibliometric indicators are 570 citations and an h-index of 12. Citation counts measure recorded citations within a particular database and at a particular time. The h-index is a combined indicator of publication output and citation activity: an h-index of 12 generally means that at least 12 publications have each received at least 12 citations within the dataset and profile from which the value was calculated. The reported figure should be confirmed against the current source profile before publication. [1] [2]
Bibliometric measures can help describe research visibility, but they should not be used in isolation to evaluate scientific merit. Citation practices vary across disciplines, publication types, and career stages. A broader assessment may consider methodological rigor, reproducibility, research integrity, collaboration, practical relevance, and the contribution of individual studies to their fields.
8. Award Suitability
The Innovative Research Award provides a recognition framework for assessing research originality, scholarly contributions, and potential scientific or societal relevance. The information supplied for this profile identifies an institutional affiliation, a subject area, and bibliometric indicators that may serve as starting points for an award review. However, these details alone do not establish eligibility, demonstrate a specific innovative achievement, or confirm that an award has been granted.
A transparent evaluation process may consider the following evidence:
- Originality and significance of the research question.
- Quality, rigor, and reproducibility of the research methods.
- Verified publication records and the researcher’s contribution to collaborative work.
- Evidence of scholarly influence, appropriate to the discipline and career stage.
- Documented scientific, technological, clinical, or societal relevance where applicable.
- Compliance with the award’s published eligibility and assessment requirements.
The named event is the International Research Awards on Network Science & Graph Analytics. Readers should consult the official event website for the applicable award categories, nomination requirements, evaluation procedures, and current event information. [3] This article does not represent an official award decision or imply that the researcher has received an award.
9. Conclusion
Nimisha Srivastava’s supplied profile identifies Amity University in India as the institutional affiliation and pharmaceutical sciences as the subject area. The reported indicators are 71 documents, 570 citations, and an h-index of 12. These details provide a preliminary overview of the research profile but require verification against current scholarly records. A fuller account of research contributions and suitability for an award would require examination of individual publications, documented findings, and the relevant award criteria. The profile should therefore be understood as an informational academic summary rather than an independent assessment or confirmation of award status.
10. External Links
11. References
- Google Scholar. (n.d.). Author profile associated with the supplied Google Scholar identifier f3P_5J8AAAAJ. The profile is provided as a source for checking indexed publications and citation indicators; the current metrics and author attribution should be verified directly.https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=f3P_5J8AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
- ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID record for the supplied identifier 0000-0002-6566-6335. ORCID provides persistent researcher identifiers that can help distinguish researchers and connect their scholarly contributions. The record should be checked to confirm the identity and associated works.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-6335
- International Research Awards on Network Science & Graph Analytics. (n.d.). Official event website. Consult the event website for published information about the conference, award categories, nomination process, and applicable eligibility criteria.
https://networkscience-conferences.researchw.com/